I repeat an older post because it seems so pertinent at the moment.
Does Israel Have a Right to Exist?
Hamas
is condemned because it refuses to accept the right of Israel to exist. A
good case can be made for Hamas on historical and moral grounds. It
may have been a mistake to establish the state of Israel in 1947 by
bringing in thousands of mostly European Jews to a land largely
populated by hostile Arabs and where few Jews had lived until well into
the 19th century. Jewish possession of the land had been lost for more
than a thousand years.
The
result has been constant hostility, hatred, wars, and violent conflict
with no end in sight. It is the source of Muslim hatred of Europe and
America, constant turmoil, and a threat to peace in the entire region.
The notion that Palestine belongs to the Jews on the basis of a divine
promise three thousand years ago is plausible only to those who find it
plausible, including Jewish and Christian fundamentalists. Granted, some
solution was needed for the constant persecution of Jews in many lands
including Europe and America, but in my opinion the formation of a
Jewish state in Palestine was probably not it.
A
distinction needs to be made between accepting the moral right of
Israel to exist and the full acceptance of the fact that Israel does
exist, will exist, and must be dealt with accordingly with all the
implications thereunto appertaining.
For
practical reasons Hamas needs to come to terms with Israel as a
reality, no matter how much they despise the fact. But pragmatism does
not flourish in the presence of deeply rooted ideology and hostility
toward Jews. The refusal of Hamas to accept this inexorable reality
practically, if not theoretically and morally, is fraught with dire
consequence for Jews and Arabs. To contest the full implications of the
actuality of Israel as a Jewish state is futile and will be the source
of continuing bloodshed and hateful agitation on and on. Sending
missiles to explode in the cities of Israel solves nothing and
perpetuates hatred and retaliation.
On
the other hand Israel needs to stop the settlements and withdraw to
their 1967 borders. This swap of land for peace needs to be accompanied
by some plan, probably internationally mediated, for compensating
Palestinian refugees for loss of their homes and livelihood because of
their expulsion from Israel in the years following Jewish statehood.
Israel needs to start treating Arabs in their territory with decency,
and full respect and guarantee them all civil and personal rights that
Jews have.
This
is not likely to happen on either side. This, after all, is the Middle
East where too few are willing to say with Yitzhak Rabin “enough of
blood and tears.” So "two communities of suffering" (Edward Said) will
continue to suffer and bleed and hate until reason or sheer exhaustion
leads to a resolution tolerable to both if not loved or welcomed by
either.
No comments:
Post a Comment